Your AI development stack, curated

The best AI coding tools, MCP workflows, and Claude Code skills — organized for developers. From editor setup to production integrations.

Build your AI stack

Tools, MCP servers, and skills that work together — from editor to production.

AI Coding Tools
8+ tools indexed
Editor extensions, code completion, pair programming tools. Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and more.
MCP Servers
6+ MCP servers indexed
Connect your AI to GitHub, databases, browsers, search, and production infrastructure.
Claude Code Skills
6+ skills indexed
Reusable workflow modules for debugging, refactoring, code review, and planning.

MCP Servers

More →

dbt MCP Server

dbt Labs documents an official Model Context Protocol server at docs.getdbt.com/docs/dbt-ai/about-mcp (repository dbt-labs/dbt-mcp) that exposes governed access to dbt project metadata, lineage, CLI actions, and dbt Platform APIs for Claude, Cursor, and custom MCP clients. Local mode runs via `uvx dbt-mcp` with environment variables such as DBT_PROJECT_DIR, DBT_HOST, DBT_TOKEN, DBT_PROD_ENV_ID, and DBT_USER_ID; remote mode connects over HTTP/SSE to a managed dbt Platform MCP endpoint with OAuth. Documented tool groups include product-doc search (`search_product_docs`, `get_product_doc_pages`) and server metadata helpers, with additional development and deployment tools synced from the GitHub README per release.

Milvus MCP Server

The zilliztech/mcp-server-milvus project (documented at milvus.io/docs/milvus_and_mcp.md) exposes Milvus vector-database operations to MCP clients such as Claude Desktop and Cursor. The recommended launch path is `uv run src/mcp_server_milvus/server.py --milvus-uri http://localhost:19530` without a separate install step, with optional `MILVUS_URI`, `MILVUS_TOKEN`, and `MILVUS_DB` environment variables. Tools listed in Milvus docs include `milvus-text-search`, `milvus-hybrid-search`, `milvus-multi-vector-search`, `milvus-query`, and `milvus-count` for collection management, semantic retrieval, filtered hybrid search, and entity counts.

Mem0 MCP Server

Mem0 documents a hosted Model Context Protocol server at https://mcp.mem0.ai/mcp that exposes Platform memory tools (`add_memory`, `search_memories`, `get_memories`, `update_memory`, `delete_memory`, `delete_all_memories`, `delete_entities`, `list_entities`, `list_events`, `get_event_status`) to Claude, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, and OpenCode. Setup uses `npx mcp-add` with HTTP transport or manual JSON/TOML client configs; Codex requires `MEM0_API_KEY` as bearer token per docs.mem0.ai/platform/mem0-mcp. The cloud server needs a Mem0 Platform API key from the dashboard and Node.js for the installer—no local vector database required for the hosted path.

ClickHouse MCP Server

The open-source ClickHouse MCP server (PyPI package `mcp-clickhouse`, repository ClickHouse/mcp-clickhouse) exposes MCP tools such as `run_query`, `list_databases`, and paginated `list_tables` against ClickHouse clusters, defaulting to read-only SQL unless `CLICKHOUSE_ALLOW_WRITE_ACCESS` is enabled. Optional chDB extras add `run_chdb_select_query` for embedded queries over files and URLs. HTTP/SSE transports require authentication via `CLICKHOUSE_MCP_AUTH_TOKEN`, FastMCP OAuth/OIDC providers, or explicit `CLICKHOUSE_MCP_AUTH_DISABLED=true` for local dev; a `/health` endpoint supports orchestrator probes without credentials per README guidance.

Datadog MCP Server

Datadog documents a remote Model Context Protocol server at docs.datadoghq.com/bits_ai/mcp_server that connects AI agents in Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, VS Code, Gemini CLI, and other MCP clients to observability data across APM, logs, metrics, monitors, dashboards, and security signals. Setup guides describe OAuth-based connection to Datadog's hosted MCP endpoint (distinct from the local-only Code Security MCP Server used for SAST/SCA scans). Fair-use limits listed in docs include 50 requests per 10 seconds burst and 50,000 monthly tool calls; Audit Trail records MCP actions with tool name, arguments, user identity, and client, while metrics `datadog.mcp.session.starts` and `datadog.mcp.tool.usage` tag usage by client and tool.

Composio MCP Server

Composio documents MCP server creation through its SDK and dashboard at docs.composio.dev: developers call `composio.mcp.create()` with toolkit names, auth config IDs, and an `allowed_tools` list, then generate per-user MCP URLs via `composio.mcp.generate(user_id, mcp_config_id)`. Hosted endpoints follow the pattern `https://backend.composio.dev/v3/mcp/{SERVER_ID}?user_id=...` and require an `x-api-key` header when `require_mcp_api_key` is enabled (default for new orgs). Docs show wiring these URLs into OpenAI Responses API, Anthropic MCP client beta, Mastra MCPClient, Claude Desktop, and Cursor. Composio notes that dynamic sessions are recommended for most use cases, while single-toolkit MCP configs suit fixed integration surfaces.

Claude Code Skills

More →

Hyperscaler cloud commitment due diligence review

Turns announcements of multi-year cloud spend commitments and earnings-day infrastructure deals into a finance-and-platform checklist. Teams separate headline dollar totals (for example five-year AWS purchase obligations) from average annual run rates, prior amended agreements, and what is actually earmarked for AI GPUs versus general-purpose silicon. The workflow maps public claims to internal FinOps data before revising data-platform budgets or agentic-AI roadmaps. It cites CNBC reporting on May 27, 2026 that Amazon disclosed a $6 billion five-year Snowflake commitment covering Graviton and AI GPUs alongside Snowflake's fiscal Q1 beat ($1.39 billion revenue, 39-cent adjusted EPS vs analyst expectations) and an undisclosed Natoma acquisition—without treating media figures as procurement instructions.

AI memory and HBM supply-chain claims due diligence

Structures verification of public claims about AI-driven memory shortages, high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand, and trillion-dollar memory-chip valuations into an evidence checklist for finance, procurement, and platform teams. The workflow separates analyst price-target moves, year-to-date equity rallies, and vendor statements about agentic-AI workloads from independently observable supply signals (long-term agreements, stated capacity constraints, peer pricing power). It cites CNBC reporting that Micron crossed a $1 trillion market cap on May 26, 2026 after UBS raised its price target from $535 to $1,625, and that SK Hynix joined the trillion-dollar club on May 27, 2026 with shares up roughly 250% year to date amid AI chip demand lifting South Korea's Kospi—without endorsing any single stock call.

Advanced chip roadmap claims due diligence review

Turns public semiconductor announcements into a verification checklist when vendors claim novel scaling laws, stacked logic architectures, or nanometer-class equivalence without independent benchmarks. Teams separate marketing nomenclature from manufacturing readiness by demanding yield, thermal, packaging, and third-party validation evidence—patterns highlighted when CNBC reported Huawei's LogicFolding and τ Scaling Law claims alongside analyst skepticism about true 1.4nm-class process breakthroughs without EUV access. The skill also maps export-control context (ASML EUV restrictions) and competitive implications for GPU vendors operating in constrained geographies.

AI economic benefit distribution readiness review

Converts public-policy and labor-relations guidance around AI-driven wealth into a planning checklist for organizations operating in semiconductor-heavy economies. Teams document how AI productivity gains translate—or fail to translate—into worker bonuses, public dividends, or reinvestment; assess concentration risk when chipmakers dominate equity indices; and prepare dialogue frameworks for recurring labor-management disputes as agentic automation scales. The skill cites CNBC reporting on South Korea's deputy prime minister urging that AI benefits reach the public amid Samsung strike negotiations, Kospi gains led by Samsung and SK Hynix, and debates over distributing AI-sector tax windfalls—without prescribing specific tax policies beyond verifying stakeholder messaging against cited facts.

Responsible AI accessibility data review

Turns Microsoft Learn responsible AI modules and accessibility remediation patterns into a checklist for teams shipping generative features that emit images, code, or UI copy. Practitioners verify training-data gaps (for example stereotypical depictions of disabled users), audit metadata labels on inclusive datasets, document human-in-the-loop fixes, and align with published principles that people remain accountable for AI outcomes. The skill references learn.microsoft.com training on responsible AI practices and real-world corrections such as purchasing supplemental multimodal data when model outputs misrepresent blind users—without skipping metadata-layer bias reviews emphasized by ML fairness practitioners.

Agentic coding vendor readiness review

Turns platform reliability and multi-vendor coding-agent guidance into a checklist before standardizing on a single AI coding stack. Teams inventory host-platform SLAs (for example GitHub availability incidents documented on githubstatus.com), compare primary and backup agents (GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, etc.), verify observability hooks through Braintrust or similar tracing, and rehearse workflows when the code host or agent API is degraded. The skill cites public status pages and vendor billing changes—such as usage-based Copilot pricing announced on github.blog—so procurement and engineering sign off with eyes open about downtime, leadership churn, and feature parity gaps reported in trade media.

AI News

All news →